Bound to a wheelchair and with only one arm, he scoots across the floor with an almost sinister look on his face. As he bumps into an empty chair he peers up at the elderly couple occupying the adjacent spots and begins to slowly reach into his breast pocket. The look on their face went from painful discomfort and misery to fearfully quizical. From his pocket, the creepy criple draws a pair of Tootsie Rolls and reaches out to the frightened couple. An offering, with barely a voice he grunts "candy?" and cracks a small corner smile. To my surprise they accepted his strange offer and with gratitude, wished him a good day. About that time another gentleman burst out his greeting to the generous fellow.. "Candyman!" he said in a raised voice, "How ya doin today?" he asked. The gentle candyman continued to wheel around the waiting room and offer sweet treats to all who were so patiently waiting for their turn to finally be attended to.
Everyone in the place seemed more than displeased about the unreasonable amount of time that they were investing while clearly experiencing pain from whatever brought them there. People like the candyman bring a temporary light to an otherwise dark place. The James A. Haley Veterans Hospital is a black hole for those who had already done so much for their/our country. I sat there for many hours today, looking at everyone around me. There were all kinds of people with all kinds of problems, some were obvious like arms and legs that were, no doubt, sacrificed during wars and others just looked defeated. I'd love to dig the stories out of these broken heros, I'd love to know how they got here.
The other thing that struck me was the absolute inefficiency of the VA system. This is a highly (government) funded hospital with hundreds of volunteers trying to help. This is federalized healthcare. This is the very system that you'll be stuck with if the left gets their way. But hey... it's free!
Free is not quite the right word, I mean it's free for me, right now. It has cost me thousands back when I was working and paying into the system and will cost me much more when I get working again. But then, I can't choose my doctor, my pharmicist, my physical therapist, my brand name medication, my glasses or even my parking space so freedom is definatly not free. This is free healthcare that I would never choose to pay for.
My day: I have been ill for a few days so I called yesterday to make a free appointment with my assigned free primary healthcare provider. The closest available opening was to be nearly a month away, but I'm very sick so I needed free help sooner. They said to come in today, after 12:30 when it's not as busy, and they'd squeeze me in. When I showed up for free help they sent me to the ER because my free doctor was busy with lots of others needing free help. I signed in at the ER and sat down. It was an hour before the free triage nurse got a chance to ask me what was wrong. She then sent me to the free Urgent Care Clinic to try to get squeezed in there. At the UCC I was asked to sit down and wait for a free doctor to become free.
An hour later, the UCC told me that I'd have to go see my free Primary Care doctor and that I could get an appointment for next month. I told them that I'd already waited for two hours for free help and that I really needed to see my free doctor. I was sent to the waiting room and told that my free doctor would squeeze me in if they had some free time. Finally, five hours after getting off of the free bus that's provided to get us from the free parking at the nearby mall, I was let in to see my free doctor. within 7 minutes I had a free diagnoses and it was free of any type of testing. I was asked some questions and given a free Rx to take to the free pharmacy. Now happy because I had been in the black hole for more than five hours, I was finally free.
Then there is the free pharmacy, to make a long long story short, you wait an average of four hours for your free medication and if you miss your name being called you have to start over again.... free of charge. Thank God for Walgreens and free enterprise, I was willing to pay to avoid the free pharmacy.
Now imagine if everyone were in this system, 300,000,000 people waiting for free help. The employees would still be paid the same but would have much more to do. What motivation would they have to make it better? Your "free healthcare" would also be free from merit. The good news is that even in our worst place, the candyman will come to brighten our days. Oh boy! that's good news! But then, candy is unhealthy and would cause a drain on our free healthcare so it would become illegal. For that matter, everything is unhealthy for us or the environment so who knows what we'd live on.
So now lets throw something else in (thank you Tim). If my fever and diarrea were just symptoms of Swine Flu what would have happened in obamas world. I'd have gotten on a free crowded bus (because cars cause global warming) to get to the the local hub and infected forty people or so along the way. Then i'd have boarded another free crouded bus headed for the free hospital and infected others while everyone who rode the first bus with me passed it on to their contacts. Once we reached the free hospital, another forty or so infected people would have filed out and into the free hospital where they passed on the free flu to everyone else that was or would be waiting countless hours for free help. By the time the free doctor got to me, and assuming they actually did enough testing to find the flu, I would have passed on the free infection to countless people who had come and gone during my hours of waiting. Those people who have left would have already taken the free busses to where ever they were going and contacted many others along the way. Thank God/Obama for free healthcare because now everyones gonna need it.
If you can't see my point then crawl back to whatever elitist university you teach at or whichever law firm you practice at and put your blinders back on. For the rest of you, I beg of you, please do not force free healthcare on all of us. I don't think we are prepaired to pay the price. Oh, and if you think that my use of the word "free" was annoying, now you know how those of us who have "free healthcare" feel when you keep preaching about it.
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Monday, April 27, 2009
The New Civil War
In much the same way our media had ignored the pirate activity that has been going on for many years on the other side of the world, they are ignoring another crises that mirrors our own situation in many ways. In Thailand there is a civil war brewing. There have been violent protests and even assanation attempts. It is a battle over Idiology and government control. It is a fight between freedom and security.
I do believe that we are on the edge of a similar war and I've been trying to figure out how it will happen. We like to think of a civil war in terms of our own historical battle between the North and South where battle lines were clearly drawn but many civil wars are far less civil than that. Many wars are fought from person to person, house to house or neighborhood to neighborhood. Small but lethal clashes between opposing factions who intend to gain the majority through genicide.
In Thailand the forces are generally divided by area but are not fighting in that manner. They are dawning their colors and taking their fights to the streets. On one side you have the Red shirts,The National United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD). This group supported the 1997 Constitution which de-centralized the government and greatly increased human rights. They do support a certain amount of socialism such as welfare and universal healthcare. They were led by Thaksin Shinawatra who was deposed by a military coup in 2006.
On the other side you have the Yellow shirts, The People's Alliance for Democracy. They supported the military coup that deposed the former leader and are led by media mogul Sondhi Limthongkul and Major General Chamlong Srimuang. Though the media considers this group conservitive they are opposed to representative democracy. They feel that the nations welfare is best left to the wisdom of it's elitists.
As you can see, their politics are a strange blend of our own but that's not the point. The chord that this story struck with me is the potential for nationwide violence. The entire nation has just come off of a "State of emergency" that begun with an outbreak of violence that erupted during a protest two weeks ago. The anger between the two sides is now elevated and there will be much more bloodshed to come. Bangkok is nothing but a crystal ball that gives us a foggy account of our own future but we along with our media are not willing to face the reality that the first shots of our civil war have already been fired.
It's a frightening prospect to think that we may one day be taking up arms against our neighbors... But, it's not an unreasonable one. The division between the left and right within our country has grown rapidly since the socialist takeover in November. The new anti-Constitutional Obama administration has begun it's disassembly of our capitalist society by pushing federal control over our Banks, Energy, Education, Health Care and Industrial sectors while (as in other imperialist regimes) they are seeking prosicution against our former leaders. This is an act that is commonly employed as a show of force and power to detour any would be detractors. His supporters are becoming more defensive about their unwavering love for the political "rock star" and are actually becoming more agressive as we saw from the tea parties.
Soon the protests will morph into violent clashes just as in Bangkok and the bloodshed will further polarize the factions. One act will serve as the "Arch Duke Ferdinand" moment that will propell us into all out war. The sides will not fight for land as an army but will fight for Idiology. The flag will be the same but the groups will wear their support on their sleeves and on their car bumpers. There will be much influence from other nations with intent to reap some of the spoils of the giant battle. Some nations, like Isreal and what ever capitalist nations are left, will support the right wing by secretly funneling weapons and technology in through the underground. Others, the more socialist nations, will help by clamping down on the capitalist allies in an attempt to choke off the resistance. While others will simply take advantage of our weakness and attempt to take us over from within. Whether it ends up as a civil war, a revolution or WWIII the net result will not be pretty. (The difference between a civil war and revolution is who wins)
This is one of many sceneriios that may lead to World War Three but the great thing about the future is that we can change it. With enough political power we can stop the socialist train and disable it for good. We can only do it if we...
A. Work together
B. Create a Political Party that adheres to what is morally right, not popular
C. Inform everyone and grow beyond the "Rock Star"
D. Protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all of its enimies.
The future is yours, go get it!
I do believe that we are on the edge of a similar war and I've been trying to figure out how it will happen. We like to think of a civil war in terms of our own historical battle between the North and South where battle lines were clearly drawn but many civil wars are far less civil than that. Many wars are fought from person to person, house to house or neighborhood to neighborhood. Small but lethal clashes between opposing factions who intend to gain the majority through genicide.
In Thailand the forces are generally divided by area but are not fighting in that manner. They are dawning their colors and taking their fights to the streets. On one side you have the Red shirts,The National United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD). This group supported the 1997 Constitution which de-centralized the government and greatly increased human rights. They do support a certain amount of socialism such as welfare and universal healthcare. They were led by Thaksin Shinawatra who was deposed by a military coup in 2006.
On the other side you have the Yellow shirts, The People's Alliance for Democracy. They supported the military coup that deposed the former leader and are led by media mogul Sondhi Limthongkul and Major General Chamlong Srimuang. Though the media considers this group conservitive they are opposed to representative democracy. They feel that the nations welfare is best left to the wisdom of it's elitists.
As you can see, their politics are a strange blend of our own but that's not the point. The chord that this story struck with me is the potential for nationwide violence. The entire nation has just come off of a "State of emergency" that begun with an outbreak of violence that erupted during a protest two weeks ago. The anger between the two sides is now elevated and there will be much more bloodshed to come. Bangkok is nothing but a crystal ball that gives us a foggy account of our own future but we along with our media are not willing to face the reality that the first shots of our civil war have already been fired.
It's a frightening prospect to think that we may one day be taking up arms against our neighbors... But, it's not an unreasonable one. The division between the left and right within our country has grown rapidly since the socialist takeover in November. The new anti-Constitutional Obama administration has begun it's disassembly of our capitalist society by pushing federal control over our Banks, Energy, Education, Health Care and Industrial sectors while (as in other imperialist regimes) they are seeking prosicution against our former leaders. This is an act that is commonly employed as a show of force and power to detour any would be detractors. His supporters are becoming more defensive about their unwavering love for the political "rock star" and are actually becoming more agressive as we saw from the tea parties.
Soon the protests will morph into violent clashes just as in Bangkok and the bloodshed will further polarize the factions. One act will serve as the "Arch Duke Ferdinand" moment that will propell us into all out war. The sides will not fight for land as an army but will fight for Idiology. The flag will be the same but the groups will wear their support on their sleeves and on their car bumpers. There will be much influence from other nations with intent to reap some of the spoils of the giant battle. Some nations, like Isreal and what ever capitalist nations are left, will support the right wing by secretly funneling weapons and technology in through the underground. Others, the more socialist nations, will help by clamping down on the capitalist allies in an attempt to choke off the resistance. While others will simply take advantage of our weakness and attempt to take us over from within. Whether it ends up as a civil war, a revolution or WWIII the net result will not be pretty. (The difference between a civil war and revolution is who wins)
This is one of many sceneriios that may lead to World War Three but the great thing about the future is that we can change it. With enough political power we can stop the socialist train and disable it for good. We can only do it if we...
A. Work together
B. Create a Political Party that adheres to what is morally right, not popular
C. Inform everyone and grow beyond the "Rock Star"
D. Protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all of its enimies.
The future is yours, go get it!
Friday, April 24, 2009
Moral Capital and Prosperity
Today I took some time to visit some of the "liberal" and "Progressive" blogs on the internet and I left comments as well as invitations to their readers. For those of you who had the courage to check me out, I welcome you. I hope that you will engage me in a friendly debate so that everyone can better understand each other. I also encourage you to take some time to read over some of my older posts and my Jimmy Strawn Plan so that you can get a feel of what I'm all about.
I enjoy looking at the thoughts and thoughtlessness of the left. Many on the right are clueless as well but at least they are not destructive to our way of life. Yes.. I'm calling liberals destructive. I realize that it's not intended but the desire to force equality above fairness has pushed the evil do-gooders into a downward spiral of bitter hatred for everything that made this country great.
I visited a site where someone gave examples of scientific proof that Global Warming is real and cited an econimist, who authored a book that glorifies globalization, as their source. Do I need to explain how absurd that is? It only serves to prove my point that the climate hoax is nothing but a ploy to create a "one world" socialist government. The people who profess to be scientists are nothing but climatologists and politicians. Climatology, by the way, is a non-science. It does not employ scientific method and those who practice it are not accountable for their findings. In other words, a climatologist will get paid well as long as there is a threat of climate disaster looming over us. If they said that things were fine they would lose funding. Plus they make predictions that are dependant on a lack of natural variables so that if the predictions don't pan out then they can tout that the changes that were made were what made the difference. It's the perfect scam.
I also visited a site that stated that only libs loved their country because they want to make sure that the rich perform their "patriotic duty" of paying taxes. WHAT?.. Since when does paying taxes equate to patriotic duties? Our patriarchs, the original tea partiers, might disagree with this moron. This nation was founded on the freedom of religion, the right to life, liberty and property and the freedom from the overwhelming tax burden. These socialists are really good at digging into other peoples hard earned money in the name of patriotism but not so good at understanding what patriotism really is. Maybe they are patriotic to some other country but not the U.S.A.
I also got a few minutes to peer into the mind of a liberal Navy wife who likes the Idea of "social capital". First of all I don't understand how anyone in the military can be (or be married to) a liberal. When you swear in to the military you are taking an oath to "defend the Constitution of the United States from its enimies, both foreign and domestic." To support Obama or the general platform of the left is to deny the Constitution as it was written. Obama has openly stated that the constitution is the fundimental problem with this nation and has expressed interest in a complete overhaul in which the document is written with much more government control. The left in general is in lockstep with this idiology and anyone who supports this is, at minimum, antipatriotic or in the case of our military they are just plain treasonist.
Somehow these people believe that the federal government is in the position to spread around everyones money in order to help "those less fortunate". From my experience, most of the less fortunate are that way by their own lack of effort. That being the case, when our forefathers founded this country they left it up to those who had earned their money to decide where their fortune should go. That's real social capital, if someone is in need of help they would have to make an effort to become worthy of help rather than just vote it away from the earners. On the flip side, those who had earned their money would be held to social standards and could enhance or impede their success based on their own charity. This means that a business owner that shunned the lower class would lose business and one who worked to make lives better would only prosper from that investment. Yes it's that simple, oir it was, until the "progressives" came and screwed it all up.
The moral of the story is that there is a huge disconnect between the politics of the left and the right. The left wants to make sure that everything is fair by enforcing equality on us through government control while the right wants to make sure that everything is equal by making us enforce fairness on each other through moral capitalism. Ironically, there is little difference in what both sides want to achieve just how they want to get there.
I submit this... The right represents a gathering of people who want to "Conserve" all of the ideals and practices that made this the greates country in the world. The left represents a gathering of people who want to "Progress" to the same ideals and practices that make all of the other countries so dependant on us. If we succumb to that philosophy, who will we depend on, who will the rest of the world depend on? Perhaps you libs should pick a state or region and move there... then in 20 years, when you're begging for us to save you from yourselves, you will understand why your philosophy has failed every time it's been tried and you can once again become a functioning and productive part of this REPUBLIC!
I enjoy looking at the thoughts and thoughtlessness of the left. Many on the right are clueless as well but at least they are not destructive to our way of life. Yes.. I'm calling liberals destructive. I realize that it's not intended but the desire to force equality above fairness has pushed the evil do-gooders into a downward spiral of bitter hatred for everything that made this country great.
I visited a site where someone gave examples of scientific proof that Global Warming is real and cited an econimist, who authored a book that glorifies globalization, as their source. Do I need to explain how absurd that is? It only serves to prove my point that the climate hoax is nothing but a ploy to create a "one world" socialist government. The people who profess to be scientists are nothing but climatologists and politicians. Climatology, by the way, is a non-science. It does not employ scientific method and those who practice it are not accountable for their findings. In other words, a climatologist will get paid well as long as there is a threat of climate disaster looming over us. If they said that things were fine they would lose funding. Plus they make predictions that are dependant on a lack of natural variables so that if the predictions don't pan out then they can tout that the changes that were made were what made the difference. It's the perfect scam.
I also visited a site that stated that only libs loved their country because they want to make sure that the rich perform their "patriotic duty" of paying taxes. WHAT?.. Since when does paying taxes equate to patriotic duties? Our patriarchs, the original tea partiers, might disagree with this moron. This nation was founded on the freedom of religion, the right to life, liberty and property and the freedom from the overwhelming tax burden. These socialists are really good at digging into other peoples hard earned money in the name of patriotism but not so good at understanding what patriotism really is. Maybe they are patriotic to some other country but not the U.S.A.
I also got a few minutes to peer into the mind of a liberal Navy wife who likes the Idea of "social capital". First of all I don't understand how anyone in the military can be (or be married to) a liberal. When you swear in to the military you are taking an oath to "defend the Constitution of the United States from its enimies, both foreign and domestic." To support Obama or the general platform of the left is to deny the Constitution as it was written. Obama has openly stated that the constitution is the fundimental problem with this nation and has expressed interest in a complete overhaul in which the document is written with much more government control. The left in general is in lockstep with this idiology and anyone who supports this is, at minimum, antipatriotic or in the case of our military they are just plain treasonist.
Somehow these people believe that the federal government is in the position to spread around everyones money in order to help "those less fortunate". From my experience, most of the less fortunate are that way by their own lack of effort. That being the case, when our forefathers founded this country they left it up to those who had earned their money to decide where their fortune should go. That's real social capital, if someone is in need of help they would have to make an effort to become worthy of help rather than just vote it away from the earners. On the flip side, those who had earned their money would be held to social standards and could enhance or impede their success based on their own charity. This means that a business owner that shunned the lower class would lose business and one who worked to make lives better would only prosper from that investment. Yes it's that simple, oir it was, until the "progressives" came and screwed it all up.
The moral of the story is that there is a huge disconnect between the politics of the left and the right. The left wants to make sure that everything is fair by enforcing equality on us through government control while the right wants to make sure that everything is equal by making us enforce fairness on each other through moral capitalism. Ironically, there is little difference in what both sides want to achieve just how they want to get there.
I submit this... The right represents a gathering of people who want to "Conserve" all of the ideals and practices that made this the greates country in the world. The left represents a gathering of people who want to "Progress" to the same ideals and practices that make all of the other countries so dependant on us. If we succumb to that philosophy, who will we depend on, who will the rest of the world depend on? Perhaps you libs should pick a state or region and move there... then in 20 years, when you're begging for us to save you from yourselves, you will understand why your philosophy has failed every time it's been tried and you can once again become a functioning and productive part of this REPUBLIC!
Monday, April 20, 2009
Crap Is Rolling UP Hill?
First of all, please forgive me for my absence. I have spent the last week moving and my computer was boxed up. Now I live in a quiet little neighborhood about 25 miles north of Tampa where my family is a little safer. To be honest, I have not spent much time doing research but I have seen some news and I'm scared to death.
This week I have gotten all of my information the same way as the general public, local news. Talk about scary, If I didn't know better I'd think that some law abiding American is handing out guns to every dope slinging, drug smuggler south of the border. I'd be learning that, for the first time since the 1700s, pirates have re-emerged somewhere over seas. I'd believe that there were a group of millionaires who paid a few hundred racists to protest against Obama and everything else that's good on April 15th. I'd think that, somehow, evil guns have stolen everyone's SUVs and were driving around shooting 8 year old girls... Need I go on?
I'd hate to use the "C" word because it belongs to the left but I'm beginning to think that we're quickly approaching "Crises" level. The media has opened it's bag of tricks, as predicted, and is pounding the propaganda every night at 5:00, 6:00, 10:00 and 11:00. They are totally invested in the fall of capitalism and are working along with most of congress as well as king Obama to drag the constitution out from under us.
This is not new. Do you remember when States had power? Yes it's true, the point of having states was to balance power and create a capitalist style of government. Let me explain... The greatest load of power and responsibility was put on local municipalities. The vast majority of legislation would take place in townships with limited oversight by the city. The counties would have a slightly more generalized level of governance over it's cities as a way to keep some amount of fluidity from city to city. Sort of like the NFL, who allows each team to pick their own players and create their own plays but just sets basic rules to make sure that they're all playing the same game. The load of regulation is supposed to dissipate as you go from county to state to federal oversight.
The reason for this is to create a sort of "market" from place to place. If a city starts encroaching on peoples rights then they have the right to move to one that does not. The first city would then lose it's tax base and would fail unless it made the necessary changes to become "marketable". This self regulating system was designed very much like the economic capitalist system on purpose, because it works! The role of the state was merely to make it reasonable for someone to move freely from city to city, that is, to prevent one city from declaring that it's money or product had value only within it's borders.
The role of the federal government was to.. A. Protect our basic rights as described in the Bill Of Rights and the Constitution. B. Bond the states together as one union with one currency. C. To protect the nations borders. If you do not fully understand these responsibilities, please let me know so I can explain them fully.
Lately (over the past 40 years) there has been a move to flip the balance of power on it's head. Our media has put the emphasis on presidential elections with less attention paid to the congress and almost none paid to local government. Everyone knows how Obama feels about the topics of the day but they don't even know who their local Representatives are. This has given an obscene amount of power to the guy that should have the least amount of power of anyone at all. Now we are about to hand that power to the "international community".
By way of international treaty, we are about to let all of the worlds least successful countries have supreme executive power over our constitution. If the world decides that it would be an act of war to produce weapons then we will be forced to stop. If the world feels that we are causing pain by not sharing our food then we will be forced to starve. Seriously, think about the possibilities! If you think I'm nuts, prove me wrong. Feel free to engage me and maybe one of us will learn something.
If you agree then spread this around and start checking into your local law makers. The only way to sway the top is to shake the bottom but if we don't do it now, it's all going to fall over.
This week I have gotten all of my information the same way as the general public, local news. Talk about scary, If I didn't know better I'd think that some law abiding American is handing out guns to every dope slinging, drug smuggler south of the border. I'd be learning that, for the first time since the 1700s, pirates have re-emerged somewhere over seas. I'd believe that there were a group of millionaires who paid a few hundred racists to protest against Obama and everything else that's good on April 15th. I'd think that, somehow, evil guns have stolen everyone's SUVs and were driving around shooting 8 year old girls... Need I go on?
I'd hate to use the "C" word because it belongs to the left but I'm beginning to think that we're quickly approaching "Crises" level. The media has opened it's bag of tricks, as predicted, and is pounding the propaganda every night at 5:00, 6:00, 10:00 and 11:00. They are totally invested in the fall of capitalism and are working along with most of congress as well as king Obama to drag the constitution out from under us.
This is not new. Do you remember when States had power? Yes it's true, the point of having states was to balance power and create a capitalist style of government. Let me explain... The greatest load of power and responsibility was put on local municipalities. The vast majority of legislation would take place in townships with limited oversight by the city. The counties would have a slightly more generalized level of governance over it's cities as a way to keep some amount of fluidity from city to city. Sort of like the NFL, who allows each team to pick their own players and create their own plays but just sets basic rules to make sure that they're all playing the same game. The load of regulation is supposed to dissipate as you go from county to state to federal oversight.
The reason for this is to create a sort of "market" from place to place. If a city starts encroaching on peoples rights then they have the right to move to one that does not. The first city would then lose it's tax base and would fail unless it made the necessary changes to become "marketable". This self regulating system was designed very much like the economic capitalist system on purpose, because it works! The role of the state was merely to make it reasonable for someone to move freely from city to city, that is, to prevent one city from declaring that it's money or product had value only within it's borders.
The role of the federal government was to.. A. Protect our basic rights as described in the Bill Of Rights and the Constitution. B. Bond the states together as one union with one currency. C. To protect the nations borders. If you do not fully understand these responsibilities, please let me know so I can explain them fully.
Lately (over the past 40 years) there has been a move to flip the balance of power on it's head. Our media has put the emphasis on presidential elections with less attention paid to the congress and almost none paid to local government. Everyone knows how Obama feels about the topics of the day but they don't even know who their local Representatives are. This has given an obscene amount of power to the guy that should have the least amount of power of anyone at all. Now we are about to hand that power to the "international community".
By way of international treaty, we are about to let all of the worlds least successful countries have supreme executive power over our constitution. If the world decides that it would be an act of war to produce weapons then we will be forced to stop. If the world feels that we are causing pain by not sharing our food then we will be forced to starve. Seriously, think about the possibilities! If you think I'm nuts, prove me wrong. Feel free to engage me and maybe one of us will learn something.
If you agree then spread this around and start checking into your local law makers. The only way to sway the top is to shake the bottom but if we don't do it now, it's all going to fall over.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
It Pays To Look
Normally I don't do this but after talking with a friend (who happens to be a wonderful person) I realized that something needed to be straightened out. This person told me that she voted for Obama because she believes in stem cell research and has someone close to her that would benefit from it's potential.
This has bothered me since then and I must get it out now. I consider myself the poster child for conservatism but I have a quarrel with some of my brethren. The loud minority of right wingers has pigeon holed all of us into the belief that the stem cell debate is all about abortion. That misconception has pushed many, otherwise conservative, voters into the arms of the Socialists that are now chipping away at our greatness.
First let me say that i recognize the potential for a moral and ethical disaster so I understand the fear. I do not, however, consider that the primary reason to attack the new federal support of stem cell research. Let me explain...
First of all we have been fed a line about which party supports that particular type of research. We were led by our incompetent media to think that the Republicans are dead set against it and that Democrats are the knights in shining armor who will defeat those murderous people haters and raise a cure for all of the worlds problems through the investment of gazillions of taxpayer dollars into the mighty stem cell.
Don't forget that it was Bush and a Republican congressional majority that first brought federal funding to stem cell research. They did it in an attempt to create more interest as well as a way to "raise the stakes" for any enterprising private industry that would be willing to invest in it's potential. That was acceptable and should have been the end of federal involvement in the field of medicine.
That might sound selfish but let's back up and think this through (something we right wingers like to do). What do you do for a living? Let's pretend that you are in charge of creating a product that would supply a vast and endless market. We'll call it a widget. Now, let's say that I (your boss) promised that the first person to create a marketable widget would receive 100% of it's profits but you would be responsible for funding your own research. It would be safe to say that you'd investigate the likely hood of your idea working before investing your entire savings into building your widget. If you had a good enough idea you would present it to others and try to gather financial support through the promise of the vast reward for your creation. Those who have the money would get to choose the most promising ideas and take the risk of investment.
Your widget would be similar to Viagra. With little or no help from the boss (government) they gathered private investors to finance a team to come up with a solution for a serious problem and are reaping the rewards. That, my friends, is the American dream!
Now let's pretend that your boss told all of you that you would be paid a decent hourly wage for the research and creation of your widget, but, once you've successfully created your widget your boss would have soul rights of distribution and profit from the product. Furthermore, once the widget was made there would no longer be a need for widget makers and you all would lose your jobs.
The point that I'm making is that Federal funding for research creates a huge market for research but no market for cures. On the other hand, if you allow the private industries to take loans at their own risk and profit from their own success then you create a smaller, more promising market for the cure.
Maybe if it weren't so lucrative to search for the cure for cancer (4.6 billion tax dollars spent in 2008) then someone might have found the cure.....
For more info on Federal Stem Cell Funding go to...
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33540.pdf
This has bothered me since then and I must get it out now. I consider myself the poster child for conservatism but I have a quarrel with some of my brethren. The loud minority of right wingers has pigeon holed all of us into the belief that the stem cell debate is all about abortion. That misconception has pushed many, otherwise conservative, voters into the arms of the Socialists that are now chipping away at our greatness.
First let me say that i recognize the potential for a moral and ethical disaster so I understand the fear. I do not, however, consider that the primary reason to attack the new federal support of stem cell research. Let me explain...
First of all we have been fed a line about which party supports that particular type of research. We were led by our incompetent media to think that the Republicans are dead set against it and that Democrats are the knights in shining armor who will defeat those murderous people haters and raise a cure for all of the worlds problems through the investment of gazillions of taxpayer dollars into the mighty stem cell.
Don't forget that it was Bush and a Republican congressional majority that first brought federal funding to stem cell research. They did it in an attempt to create more interest as well as a way to "raise the stakes" for any enterprising private industry that would be willing to invest in it's potential. That was acceptable and should have been the end of federal involvement in the field of medicine.
That might sound selfish but let's back up and think this through (something we right wingers like to do). What do you do for a living? Let's pretend that you are in charge of creating a product that would supply a vast and endless market. We'll call it a widget. Now, let's say that I (your boss) promised that the first person to create a marketable widget would receive 100% of it's profits but you would be responsible for funding your own research. It would be safe to say that you'd investigate the likely hood of your idea working before investing your entire savings into building your widget. If you had a good enough idea you would present it to others and try to gather financial support through the promise of the vast reward for your creation. Those who have the money would get to choose the most promising ideas and take the risk of investment.
Your widget would be similar to Viagra. With little or no help from the boss (government) they gathered private investors to finance a team to come up with a solution for a serious problem and are reaping the rewards. That, my friends, is the American dream!
Now let's pretend that your boss told all of you that you would be paid a decent hourly wage for the research and creation of your widget, but, once you've successfully created your widget your boss would have soul rights of distribution and profit from the product. Furthermore, once the widget was made there would no longer be a need for widget makers and you all would lose your jobs.
The point that I'm making is that Federal funding for research creates a huge market for research but no market for cures. On the other hand, if you allow the private industries to take loans at their own risk and profit from their own success then you create a smaller, more promising market for the cure.
Maybe if it weren't so lucrative to search for the cure for cancer (4.6 billion tax dollars spent in 2008) then someone might have found the cure.....
For more info on Federal Stem Cell Funding go to...
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33540.pdf
Monday, April 13, 2009
Shooting Fish In A Barrel
Something was e-mailed to me recently and I have not had a chance to confirm the info but I will share it with you anyway. We are staring down the barrel of some of the tightest gun regulation in the history of this nation. Many of the people that I've spoken with are in support of better regulation because it seems like the logical way to fix the "gun violence problem". They are wrong, removing a tool from the good to protect from the evil has never worked.
This is ownership through regulation, similar to the new socialist takeover of our banking sector. Obama himself has said that they don't want to take over the banks and the auto industry but they just want to prevent them from making decisions that are not in the best interest of Americans. That is tantamount to saying that I don't want to take over your home, I just want to be the final decision maker on how you run it, what color you paint it, who lives in it, how many channels you can have on your TV and when you need to leave it... but you will still own it and you will be required to pay me a fee (through taxes) for making your decisions so much safer for your home.
Yes America, you will be absolutely free to own guns. Assuming you meet the standards and requirements set by those who have never been a victim nor lived in a place where your neighbors watch your young child play while they made plans to abduct them and perform unspeakable acts with them. Even if you meet those qualifications you will be told where you can keep the gun, which one you can have, how often and where you can fire it, which bullets you can have and when you must turn it in (for the safety of "the people") and you will pay a heavy fee for that "right".
You have the right to turn in your guns if that's what you want.. but.. you have the responsibility to protect our right to keep them. Below is a list of morons that gave up that right and left the power in the hands of government... Like shooting fish in a barrel!
A LITTLE GUN HISTORY
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ------------------------------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ------------------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated. ------------------------------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated ------------------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ---- ------------- -------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ------------------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. -----------------------------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million. ------------------------------
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own Government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in:
List of 7 items:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent.
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent.
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!
In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.
There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort, and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.
You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.
With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are'subjects'.
During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!
If you value your freedom, please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends.
The purpose of fighting is to win. There is possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.
SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN! SWITZERLAND 'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE. SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!
IT'S A NO BRAINER! DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OURTAX DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.
I'm a firm believer of the 2nd Amendment! If you are too, please forward.
This is ownership through regulation, similar to the new socialist takeover of our banking sector. Obama himself has said that they don't want to take over the banks and the auto industry but they just want to prevent them from making decisions that are not in the best interest of Americans. That is tantamount to saying that I don't want to take over your home, I just want to be the final decision maker on how you run it, what color you paint it, who lives in it, how many channels you can have on your TV and when you need to leave it... but you will still own it and you will be required to pay me a fee (through taxes) for making your decisions so much safer for your home.
Yes America, you will be absolutely free to own guns. Assuming you meet the standards and requirements set by those who have never been a victim nor lived in a place where your neighbors watch your young child play while they made plans to abduct them and perform unspeakable acts with them. Even if you meet those qualifications you will be told where you can keep the gun, which one you can have, how often and where you can fire it, which bullets you can have and when you must turn it in (for the safety of "the people") and you will pay a heavy fee for that "right".
You have the right to turn in your guns if that's what you want.. but.. you have the responsibility to protect our right to keep them. Below is a list of morons that gave up that right and left the power in the hands of government... Like shooting fish in a barrel!
A LITTLE GUN HISTORY
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ------------------------------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ------------------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated. ------------------------------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated ------------------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ---- ------------- -------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ------------------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. -----------------------------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million. ------------------------------
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own Government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in:
List of 7 items:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent.
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent.
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!
In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.
There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort, and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.
You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.
With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are'subjects'.
During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!
If you value your freedom, please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends.
The purpose of fighting is to win. There is possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.
SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN! SWITZERLAND 'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE. SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!
IT'S A NO BRAINER! DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OURTAX DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.
I'm a firm believer of the 2nd Amendment! If you are too, please forward.
Saturday, April 4, 2009
Don't Say I Didn't Warn You!
So, today the unemployment rate soared to 8.5%. Everyone is freaking out like the world is coming to an end. Let me ask you... If you had to bet your money on something would you be okay with a 92% chance of winning? If you were thinking about surgery and the success rate was 92% would you do it? If 92% of the passengers in a plane crash survived would you call that an abject failure? If your local sports team won 92% of their games would you fire the coach and replace all of he players? If I kept giving examples would 92% of you stop reading? Okay probably so but the examples stand on their own.
How is it that when Bill Clinton bragged that "92% of the jobs that I've created were in the private sector" the media considered that a perfect record but with national employment at 92% we are in a global crises. It also staggers me that Bill Clinton professed in 1996 that 5.2% unemployment was the best it could get without causing inflation, that 5% of the country would choose not to work no matter what, but today we are a mere 3% higher and in the beginning of deflation yet "the fundamentals of capitalism are flawed". Who writes this crap?
The media, lawyers and entertainers have been taken over by communists as described by Cleon Skousen (author of the Naked Communist). We are being fed "propaganda punch" and most of America is drinking the Kool Aid like dollar beer at the strip club. If the Kool Aid reference is confuses you just go to http://freedomfront.blogspot.com/2009/02/have-you-heard-of-dihydrogen-monoxide.html. Please don't let your friends fall for this crap.
While I'm on the topic of propaganda, I wrote a post about what was going to happen with our gun rights back in December of last year and you should check it out again... Don't say I didn't warn you! Just hit http://freedomfront.blogspot.com/2008/12/with-economy-spiraling-out-of-control.html and enjoy my prediction.
Now that we've started seeing the predicted increase in gun violence and the media is jumping on it, we are getting the expected response. There is a new push in congress for emergency gun control legislation. I'm all for it, I think we should be teaching everyone to control a gun so that these morons who have been abusing their basic rights would have been shot dead, long before they did so much damage.. but I'm not sure that's what they mean by "gun control".
I just don't understand the logic that taking away our protection and making us wait for the cops to come and stop our killer is a good idea. I mean, even if you took away all of guns in the world, how do you stop someone from driving through a crowded market and killing countless people until the cops show up to stop him with their tazers? Let some animal drive into a market where I'm shopping and I'll show you what gun control really is.
On the topic of predictions I just want to remind you of what the Naked Communist predicted. Below is the summary of steps, as defined in 1963, that the left wing communist progressives had planned to take over our country. Be sure to copy and print this list and show everyone you know. Let them see proof that this swing towards socialism is actually the fruit of a tree that was planted 46 years ago.
Current Communist Goals
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet Satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the Germany question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the U.S. has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent office.15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States...
One more thing..
I predict that N. Korea will launch the "rocket" despite the threats from Bobama and other world leaders. This will bring about a movement to make the "Blue Helmets" (United Nations Peacekeeping ) a stronger, more dominant force in order to back the threats of the "international community". That means that Army's from around the world would generally be under the control of their own leaders but ultimately be beholden to the orders of the U.N.. With that power in place Bobama and the rest of the U.N. security counsel can enforce economical restraints on America under the guise of "repairing the global economical catastrophe" using our own military to override our Constitution as explained in my most recent post. Don't say I didn't warn you!
How is it that when Bill Clinton bragged that "92% of the jobs that I've created were in the private sector" the media considered that a perfect record but with national employment at 92% we are in a global crises. It also staggers me that Bill Clinton professed in 1996 that 5.2% unemployment was the best it could get without causing inflation, that 5% of the country would choose not to work no matter what, but today we are a mere 3% higher and in the beginning of deflation yet "the fundamentals of capitalism are flawed". Who writes this crap?
The media, lawyers and entertainers have been taken over by communists as described by Cleon Skousen (author of the Naked Communist). We are being fed "propaganda punch" and most of America is drinking the Kool Aid like dollar beer at the strip club. If the Kool Aid reference is confuses you just go to http://freedomfront.blogspot.com/2009/02/have-you-heard-of-dihydrogen-monoxide.html. Please don't let your friends fall for this crap.
While I'm on the topic of propaganda, I wrote a post about what was going to happen with our gun rights back in December of last year and you should check it out again... Don't say I didn't warn you! Just hit http://freedomfront.blogspot.com/2008/12/with-economy-spiraling-out-of-control.html and enjoy my prediction.
Now that we've started seeing the predicted increase in gun violence and the media is jumping on it, we are getting the expected response. There is a new push in congress for emergency gun control legislation. I'm all for it, I think we should be teaching everyone to control a gun so that these morons who have been abusing their basic rights would have been shot dead, long before they did so much damage.. but I'm not sure that's what they mean by "gun control".
I just don't understand the logic that taking away our protection and making us wait for the cops to come and stop our killer is a good idea. I mean, even if you took away all of guns in the world, how do you stop someone from driving through a crowded market and killing countless people until the cops show up to stop him with their tazers? Let some animal drive into a market where I'm shopping and I'll show you what gun control really is.
On the topic of predictions I just want to remind you of what the Naked Communist predicted. Below is the summary of steps, as defined in 1963, that the left wing communist progressives had planned to take over our country. Be sure to copy and print this list and show everyone you know. Let them see proof that this swing towards socialism is actually the fruit of a tree that was planted 46 years ago.
Current Communist Goals
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet Satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the Germany question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the U.S. has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent office.15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States...
One more thing..
I predict that N. Korea will launch the "rocket" despite the threats from Bobama and other world leaders. This will bring about a movement to make the "Blue Helmets" (United Nations Peacekeeping ) a stronger, more dominant force in order to back the threats of the "international community". That means that Army's from around the world would generally be under the control of their own leaders but ultimately be beholden to the orders of the U.N.. With that power in place Bobama and the rest of the U.N. security counsel can enforce economical restraints on America under the guise of "repairing the global economical catastrophe" using our own military to override our Constitution as explained in my most recent post. Don't say I didn't warn you!
Thursday, April 2, 2009
The Declaration of War
Today the "international community" fired a shot across the bow and now they are waiting for a response. These "Pirates" like Russian President Dmitry "Long John" Medvedev, Italian Prime Minister Silvio "Bootstrap" Berlusconi and Barack "Black Beard" Obama have come together in an effort to "Fix" the worlds problems.
This was a a clear warning to the freedom loving Americans who might be thinking about mutiny. They intend to create a world government, which in turn creates a world military. Think about it, We have the "Active Army" which answers to the president and each state has its own "National Guard" which answers to it's state governor. In this new world government each nation will have its own military but there will be an international military to run things. In much the same way that our National Guard, who belongs to the state, would ultimately be under the control of the Federal Government during times of crises... Our American Army would fall under the control of the global government if they feel threatened.
I have always felt secure that our soldiers would never allow Washington to stage a military takeover within our borders, I know that most of our fighting men and women would take our side if a political civil war were to break out as a result of the Democratic push to socialism. Evidently, Bobama has figured this out as well. I am not much of a conspiritorialist but I think that there is a clear objective tied into this G20 thing. An international Army would have an edge over the coalition of military and non-military patriotic Americans.
Do you remember when Bobama was campaigning for president? Do you remember him doing it in other countries? Do you think that was an accident, like he just got a little confused and took the wrong turn at Albuquerque landing him in Germany? This Fascist pirate has been planning his world domination for years. In the name of "fairness" he is going to pool all of the resources of the world and hand them out equally (that is except for the huge payments to those who got him there). He will rape, plunder and pillage every successful industry and in a fashion reminiscent of Robin Hood, he and his crew will distribute his booty to the poor.
It has always been with good intentions that historical tyrants have gathered power and forced their will on others. The belief that "If I ran the world, everything would be fair" has led to disparity every time it's been tried. The fact is that the only way to give to those who will not work is to take from those who will.. and when they, the workers, tire of carrying the load nothing will get done and all will fail. That is why socialism hasn't worked the other 10,000 times that it's been attempted and that is why Socialist nations always become aggressive. They run out of productive people and have to expand to keep the lazy people from turning on them.
What do we do? Well.. I'll tell you.
1. Start talking, tell everyone you know what's happening. Gather support and figure out who is against you (that may be important one day)
2. Be seen and heard, write all of your public officials from the president down to your dog catcher. Tell them you will not stand for the "change" that we're being handed nor will you support anyone who will!
3. Support your supporters, THIS IS WAR!... when you do business find out if the proprietor supports Bobama (just ask). If so, FIRE THEM! If not, send me a link to their business and we'll all support them. There will be jobs lost but this is better than fighting with bombs and bullets.
4. Most importantly.. There is an election coming up next year and we must win. I'm not saying that Republicans must win, I mean the American people must win! We need to start the campaign TODAY.
During the campaign season our representatives start voting for their jobs, that is, they know that the rest of the time they aren't being watched by the majority of Americans so they vote however they want. Once they are being watched they start leaning towards whatever votes will keep them in their cushy jobs. If we let them know that we are watching and that their jobs are in danger they will stop supporting the swing to the left. Very similar to how the republicans started leaning left because that movement became popular we must make patriotism popular again. It was much easier for the Liberals because they fed on ignorance and we must feed on enlightenment.
Now you have the tools to build the plank and now you must find the courage to force these pirates to walk it!
This was a a clear warning to the freedom loving Americans who might be thinking about mutiny. They intend to create a world government, which in turn creates a world military. Think about it, We have the "Active Army" which answers to the president and each state has its own "National Guard" which answers to it's state governor. In this new world government each nation will have its own military but there will be an international military to run things. In much the same way that our National Guard, who belongs to the state, would ultimately be under the control of the Federal Government during times of crises... Our American Army would fall under the control of the global government if they feel threatened.
I have always felt secure that our soldiers would never allow Washington to stage a military takeover within our borders, I know that most of our fighting men and women would take our side if a political civil war were to break out as a result of the Democratic push to socialism. Evidently, Bobama has figured this out as well. I am not much of a conspiritorialist but I think that there is a clear objective tied into this G20 thing. An international Army would have an edge over the coalition of military and non-military patriotic Americans.
Do you remember when Bobama was campaigning for president? Do you remember him doing it in other countries? Do you think that was an accident, like he just got a little confused and took the wrong turn at Albuquerque landing him in Germany? This Fascist pirate has been planning his world domination for years. In the name of "fairness" he is going to pool all of the resources of the world and hand them out equally (that is except for the huge payments to those who got him there). He will rape, plunder and pillage every successful industry and in a fashion reminiscent of Robin Hood, he and his crew will distribute his booty to the poor.
It has always been with good intentions that historical tyrants have gathered power and forced their will on others. The belief that "If I ran the world, everything would be fair" has led to disparity every time it's been tried. The fact is that the only way to give to those who will not work is to take from those who will.. and when they, the workers, tire of carrying the load nothing will get done and all will fail. That is why socialism hasn't worked the other 10,000 times that it's been attempted and that is why Socialist nations always become aggressive. They run out of productive people and have to expand to keep the lazy people from turning on them.
What do we do? Well.. I'll tell you.
1. Start talking, tell everyone you know what's happening. Gather support and figure out who is against you (that may be important one day)
2. Be seen and heard, write all of your public officials from the president down to your dog catcher. Tell them you will not stand for the "change" that we're being handed nor will you support anyone who will!
3. Support your supporters, THIS IS WAR!... when you do business find out if the proprietor supports Bobama (just ask). If so, FIRE THEM! If not, send me a link to their business and we'll all support them. There will be jobs lost but this is better than fighting with bombs and bullets.
4. Most importantly.. There is an election coming up next year and we must win. I'm not saying that Republicans must win, I mean the American people must win! We need to start the campaign TODAY.
During the campaign season our representatives start voting for their jobs, that is, they know that the rest of the time they aren't being watched by the majority of Americans so they vote however they want. Once they are being watched they start leaning towards whatever votes will keep them in their cushy jobs. If we let them know that we are watching and that their jobs are in danger they will stop supporting the swing to the left. Very similar to how the republicans started leaning left because that movement became popular we must make patriotism popular again. It was much easier for the Liberals because they fed on ignorance and we must feed on enlightenment.
Now you have the tools to build the plank and now you must find the courage to force these pirates to walk it!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
